The heart of this question is finding out how well and how productively you work with other people. The person conducting the interview knows they could be the one working with you in the future and wants to know you will not be dead-weight, being someone that rides on the coattails of others and does not propose ideas or effort or even worse an Anchor, someone that creates arguments over trivial matters and works counterproductive to the goals of the team.
An ideal story will have the following characteristics:
- The problem the team is taking on will be real and meaningful to the organization in which the team is apart. If you are a student, this could be a club or school project, for an executive it could be to divisions of a company working together to take advantage of a new opportunity. The importance here is that you are talking about a meaningful project that had significance for a definable reason.
- Your response should contain conflict that occurs within the team with regards to the correct course of action. People from diverse backgrounds with different skill sets see things differently. However, in any conflict we always maintain professionalism, are empathetic towards the other team members point of view.
- The pros and cons of each of the courses of action should be identified and developed by the team before the team goes to implement its solution. Often the root concern of a team member could be buried and must be uncovered. This comes from taking a deep dive into the problem and not just looking at surface issues.
- The team should compromise, to determine the best course of action, but avoid making a camel, as the adage goes, a camel is a horse made by committee. The solution should be seen as the best course of action. But it is likely that some corrective action may need to be taken after implementation of the solution to “right the ship”, make sure to include these types of details in your story as these are critical details.
- The team should ultimately have full buy in from its members as well as a successful outcome. This means that once the team “makes a decision” the brainstorming phase is over, and the team moves on to full implementation of the strategy it has agreed to. In cases where a team member has disagreements regarding the course of action they should still move forward with the plan to the best of their ability.
- [Optional] In exceptional interview stories the solution is then leveraged into other areas of the firm's business process. This makes the team’s work even more powerful than just the problem it seeks to solve. It solved many more problems using its new process.
Key Points:
- All members of the team should be treated with respect at all times. In reality you may have loathed one of your team members, an interview is not the time for venting about issues with past coworkers.
- Do not tell a story where you “just went along with the crowd”, remember companies are not looking for “yes men and women” or blind compliance. They need people that express their ideas. If you are right fight for your point of view, if you are not able to win the support of the team for your position work to the best of your ability to make the solution chosen a success.
- Having a team member play “Devils Advocate” to develop your “worst case scenario” is fine provided the other members of the team know that is the role the person is taking on, and that they are not trying to sabotage the team.
Good luck with developing your story! Remember to add 3-4 Traits found at the bottom of this page to your story. Also review the other sample questions at the bottom of the pages and practice converting this story to those other answers.
Following this six-point story flow explained in this video will help you to develop a wonderful answer to this surprisingly challenging interview question type.